07-09-2019

Dunger argued that the fishing trip was not inconsistent with his medical restrictions and because the fishing trip took place between his shifts, he was not dishonestly using FMLA leave. The federal district court disagreed and upheld UP’s right to terminate Dunger. According to the court, “Even if [Dunger] was successfully able to identify flaws in UP’s reasons for Plaintiff’s termination, Plaintiff has provided no basis to infer that UP relied on anything other than Plaintiff’s dishonesty.” That dishonesty was a lawful basis for termination. The court went on to state that “no reasonable fact finder could determine that Plaintiff’s taking FMLA leave was a negative factor in his termination.”