07-03-2019

Jack in the Box denied all of Ramirez’ allegations, claiming her initial injury did not take place on the job and that she never requested accommodations for the second injury. Furthermore, the company asserted that she was fired for cause, the manipulation of a system designed to measure the speed of service in the drive-thru. Jack in the Box did produce video during the trial to support its defense.
The jury found that Ramirez’s age was a “substantial motivating reason” in the company’s decision to terminate her. It also found she had been fired due to her disabilities and complaints about sexual harassment. She was awarded $5.4 million in lost wages and emotional distress and $10 million in compensatory damages. Jack in the Box has expressed its intention to appeal the decision.